羞羞视频

Sears Holdings Corporation (NASDAQ: SHLD) today responded to the recommendation of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of Sears Canada (TSX: SCC) to reject its offer.

Alan Lacy, Vice Chairman of Sears Holdings commented: "We are disappointed that the Special Committee has recommended against our offer; however we recognize that the Special Committee was constrained in its ability to recommend that shareholders accept our offer as a result of the valuation range contained in what we believe to be a flawed valuation report. The optimistic expectations for Sears Canada's business that form the basis for the valuation report are unrealistic and inconsistent with the increasingly competitive retail market in Canada. We remain committed to our C$16.86 offer, which we continue to believe represents a full and fair price for the Company."

Sears Holdings suggests that shareholders should consider whether the following actions are consistent with the Genuity valuation report, which is the principal underpinning of the Special Committee's recommendation:

  *  In September and November 2005, members of Sears Canada's senior
     operating management, including the Chief Executive Officer, sold over
     60% of their holdings at an average price of C$13.58, after adjusting
     for the December C$18.64 distribution.  As outlined in the Director's
     Circular, senior management, who are not constrained by the valuation
     report, has not made a determination to reject our offer.

  *  The six directors who comprise the Special Committee have failed to
     purchase any shares of Sears Canada in the last three years, with the
     exception of a single purchase of 1,000 shares in 2004.  In addition,
     Sears Canada offers its directors the option of receiving their annual
     compensation in either stock or cash, and all but one of the members of
     the Special Committee have rejected shares and elected 100% cash in
     each of the last three years.  Sears Holdings notes that the share
     price twelve months ago was C$17.295, and averaged C$15.14 for the
     prior two years, less than half of the combined C$35.50 value of the
     offer and the December C$18.64 per share distribution, and suggests
     that if the Independent Directors had believed the value of Sears
     Canada was more than twice the then trading value, the Independent
     Directors would have purchased or elected a greater number of shares.

  *  Not until the Sears Holdings employees who serve on the Board of
     Directors of Sears Canada ("Sears Holdings Directors") initiated the
     sale of the credit card business and the subsequent cash distribution,
     did the Board of Sears Canada or any of the Independent Directors seek
     to take the actions that one would expect in the event that a board
     believed the shares were trading at a significant discount to the value
     of the company.  In particular, in the last five years Sears Canada has
     only repurchased a total of approximately one half of one percent of
     the outstanding shares.

  *  Several of the Independent Directors were reluctant to approve either
     the sale of the Sears Canada credit card business or the December
     special distribution of the sale proceeds because of concerns regarding
     the prospects of the retail business.  As a result, they specifically
     conditioned their approval of the distribution on receiving a solvency
     opinion from the Company's Chief Financial Officer.

"Now that all Sears Canada shareholders have enjoyed an increase in the value of their common shares from the sale of the credit card business and the cost reduction initiatives, Sears Holdings is offering all shareholders liquidity at a price that represents a significant premium to historical trading values," said Mr. Lacy. "Our offer has the support of Natcan, the largest minority shareholder of Sears Canada, who actively negotiated the price, which is at a significant premium to the prices at which Sears Canada's senior management recently sold shares."

Mr. Lacy concluded: "We have owned over 53% of Sears Canada for more than 20 years and, if necessary, we are comfortable continuing to own less than 100%. On March 17, 2006, shareholders will only have two choices: either tender to the Sears Holdings offer or continue to hold shares, which we believe will thereafter trade at a significant discount to our offer."

Issues Raised by the Special Committee

Sears Holdings Directors have responded to certain specific issues cited by the Special Committee in its recommendation in the Directors' Circular. Their response is included in Schedule B to the Directors' Circular. In particular, the Sears Holdings Directors believe that the implementation of cost reductions by Sears Canada and the new arrangements with JP Morgan Chase for the credit card business were known to the market and had been factored into the price of Sears Canada's common shares before the announcement of the offer. In addition, Sears Holdings does not believe that there are further material benefits that would accrue to Sears Holdings as a result of owning 100% of Sears Canada's Common Shares beyond what is reflected in the Offer.

Genuity Response to Offer Circular

In its Offering Circular, Sears Holdings sets forth its belief that the Genuity valuation report is flawed, including the projections they developed based on a number of unrealistic assumptions. In particular, Sears Holdings points out that:

  *  Genuity continues to fail to adjust its valuation range to reflect that
     the Sears Canada name and key brands are, in fact, owned by Sears
     Holdings and currently licensed to Sears Canada on a royalty-free
     basis.  When Sears Holdings informed Genuity on February 2, 2005 of the
     existence of the contract governing Sears Canada's right to use the
     Sears name and Sears brands, Genuity admitted that it had not reviewed
     the contract, but had assumed that Sears Canada would continue to have
     the rights to these brands indefinitely.  After reviewing the contract,
     Genuity declined to adjust its valuation asserting that any such
     adjustment would be too "speculative" and implying that a third party
     purchaser would pay full value for Sears Canada without receiving any
     of its key brands, including the "Sears" name.  Unlike the
     inappropriate examples of Woolco and Aikenheads suggested by Genuity,
     Sears is one of the most valuable brands in Canada and product sales
     under the "Kenmore", "Craftsman" and "Die-Hard" brands represent a
     material proportion of Sears Canada's revenues.

  *  Genuity also continues to refuse to provide an accurate multiple for
     the recent Hudson's Bay Company transaction, despite suggesting that it
     is the most comparable transaction and admitting that the multiple
     currently included in its valuation report should be adjusted downward
     to reflect the recently announced credit card sale.  Further, Genuity
     comments that calculation of the multiple is "speculative" or
     "potentially misleading" without non-public information, and that
     direct comparison with Sears Canada is "difficult", but then specifies
     a valuation for precedent transactions, which relies very heavily on
     this admittedly incorrect multiple.  As Sears Holdings described in its
     Offer Circular, an appropriately adjusted HBC transaction multiple,
     reflecting the increasingly competitive retail environment in Canada
     and the expected continued loss of market share by department stores to
     off-mall competitors, applied to Sears Canada would produce values
     below Sears Holding's offer.

  *  Sears Holdings previously noted that Genuity's projections are based on
     a significant and unrealistic reversal of the decline of Sears Canada's
     financial performance. Genuity now attempts to defend its projections
     by basing future growth assumptions on the revenue growth of Sears
     Canada over a 10 to 15 year period.  This completely ignores the recent
     and dramatic change in the competitive landscape in Canada and bases
     assumptions on an historical 15-year period that dates back long before
     the enormous, detrimental impact of formidable competitors such as Wal-
     Mart, Home Depot and Best Buy and the relatively rapid growth of
     competitors such as Canadian Tire, Rona and Reitmans.  In addition,
     Genuity selects an inappropriate period of time that includes the
     addition of approximately $600 million in sales from Sears Canada's
     acquisition of Eaton's and another $800 million of sales that can be
     attributed to 207 new Home and Dealer stores opened between 1991 and
     2005.  Genuity's attempt to defend its projections by relying on 15-
     year revenue growth rates and ignoring acquisitions and store additions
     is unconvincing, and calls into question the other aggressive and
     unrealistic assumptions underlying its Base Case projections.

  *  Genuity does not address the reduction in gross margin that Sears
     Holdings pointed out will result as the balance of sales continues to
     shift to appliances, the only area with increasing sales, and away from
     soft lines that carry a 700 basis point higher gross margin.

  *  Genuity also attempts to provide some support for its projections by
     referring to the fact that Sears Holdings initiated and was aware of
     the cost reduction exercise at Sears Canada.  This too is misleading.
     While the Sears Holdings Directors requested that management set long-
     term goals for cost reductions, the Sears Holdings Directors did not
     set or approve the goals.  Sears Holdings is concerned that it has not
     seen any significant progress on the cost reductions, with the
     exception of the headcount and advertising reductions.  In fact,
     included in Genuity's projected cost savings are ambitious plans to
     increase gross margin through better purchasing, reduced returns, and
     lower warranty costs.  Sears Canada has attempted to reverse the
     negative trends in gross margin over the last five years without
     success because of the increased competitive and price pressures in
     Canada.  As a result, Sears Holdings questions whether Sears Canada
     will achieve any meaningful success in the efforts to reduce these
     elements of costs of goods sold, let alone sufficient success to off-
     set the competitive and balance-of-sale pressures on gross margin.

Sears Holdings is offering to acquire any and all of the outstanding common shares of Sears Canada Inc., other than those already held by Sears Holdings and its affiliates, for C$16.86 per share in cash. Sears Holdings currently owns approximately 53.8% of the outstanding shares of Sears Canada. The offer is open for acceptance until 8:00 pm Eastern Standard Time on March 17, 2006. While the offer is subject to customary conditions, it is not subject to a minimum tender condition. Sears Holdings will acquire any and all shares validly tendered to its offer prior to the expiration date.

About Sears Holdings Corporation

Sears Holdings Corporation is the third largest broadline retailer in North America with approximately $55 billion in annual revenues, and with approximately 3,900 full-line and specialty retail stores in the United States and Canada. Sears Holdings is the leading home appliance retailer as well as a leader in tools, lawn and garden, home electronics and automotive repair and maintenance. Key proprietary brands include Kenmore, Craftsman and DieHard, and a broad apparel offering, including such well-known labels as Lands' End, Jaclyn Smith and Joe Boxer, as well as the Apostrophe and Covington brands. It also has Martha Steward Everyday products, which are offered exclusively in the U.S. by Kmart and in Canada by Sears Canada. The company is the nation's largest provider of home services, with more than 14 million service calls made annually. For more information, visit Sears Holdings' website at .

SOURCE: Sears Holdings Corporation

CONTACT: Sears Holdings Public Relations, +1-847-286-8371

Web site: